Discrimination? Alive and well.
Thursday, August 28th, 2008It’s a long time now since the Stephen Lawrence enquiry, but race discrimination in the police seems to be a hurdle that is not beaten. We have in today’s news a high profile allegation of racist victimisation and religious discrimination against the Commissioner, Sir Ian Blair, by a very senior officer who is Asian.
Less favourable treatment constituting race discrimination at work is evident if it relates to the way in which a recruitment exercise is conducted, the terms of the employee’s employment, the opportunities given for promotion, transfer or training, or the access given to any benefits, facilities or services. I haven’t yet heard the details are of the current allegations lodged in the employment tribunal, but the allegations are around how the officer was managed under the direction of the top man, amongst others.
For the purposes of illumination, another case was recently reported of a black African PC of Nigerian origin who brought a claim against Derbyshire Constabulary.
In 2005, PC Bayode brought a claim of discrimination based on the way in which his performance development review had been conducted and alleged “harsh monitoring and over-close supervision by superiors and colleagues”, amounting to race discrimination and/or victimisation. This allegation related to a number of incidents when PC Bayode’s conduct was questioned, and reports were made by colleagues at the request of senior officers. The reports related to a perceived failure to support a colleague during the arrest of a drug dealer and a delay in responding to a bomb threat. No formal disciplinary action resulted.
Some of those colleagues had in fact been careful to jot down contemporaneous notes in their own notebooks, precisely because they feared that PC Bayode might later allege race discrimination. One female PC had recorded sexist remarks made by PC Boyode to her. No formal action was taken against him although he was counselled about his remarks.
In the end, PC Bayode lost his claim in the tribunal and on appeal. It seems that the tribunals assumed that what was written in the notebooks was true, even if this practice of making notes on a colleague is unusual. Even if no action resulted from the entries, they had been read by senior officers who could have been influenced by them. I for one would probably take exception to being singled out for such treatment by my colleagues. Having said that, it seems the WPC did not pursue any complaint of sex discrimination, and I might not have let that go either!
